On 09/22/2016 12:56 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Ok, I looked into this a bit more, and while I'm still fine with the patch I think it's only half of what we should do here. There really is no point in doing the first non-blocking path in blk_mq_map_request either as bt_get itself already does the non-blocking pass, and also runs the queue when scheduling in the later loop as well. So to get towards what I had in my tree we also need something like this:
Good point, I'll apply this one as well. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
