Re: kernel 4.8-rc5 kernel BUG at block/blk-core.c:2032!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 08.09.2016 um 19:33 schrieb Shaohua Li:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:16:59AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 09/08/2016 02:23 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> while trying Kernel 4.8-rc5 my raid5 breaks every few minutes.
>>>
>>> Trace:
>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> kernel BUG at block/blk-core.c:2032!
>>> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
>>> Modules linked in: netconsole ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_multiport
>>> iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables 8021q garp bonding sb_edac edac_core
>>> x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp kvm_intel kvm i2c_i801 irqbypass i2c_smbus
>>> ipmi_si crc32_pclmul i2c_core ghash_clmulni_intel shpchp ipmi_msghandler
>>> button loop fuse btrfs dm_mod raid10 raid0 multipath linear raid456
>>> async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq
>>> raid1 md_mod sg sd_mod ixgbe i40e mdio usbhid ehci_pci ehci_hcd ahci
>>> usbcore ptp libahci usb_common megaraid_sas pps_core
>>> CPU: 8 PID: 1105 Comm: md0_raid5 Not tainted 4.8.0-rc5-00003-g3abda5c #2
>>> Hardware name: Supermicro X10DRH/X10DRH-iT, BIOS 1.0c 02/18/2015
>>> task: ffff97de5e1e0000 task.stack: ffff97de597a0000
>>> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffbc3b3890>] [<ffffffffbc3b3890>]
>>> generic_make_request+0x1c0/0x1d0
>>> RSP: 0018:ffff97de597a3aa0 EFLAGS: 00010286
>>> RAX: ffff97de5e1e0000 RBX: ffff97dd227e5030 RCX: 0000000000000000
>>> RDX: ffffffffc0000001 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff97de5e7d9db8
>>> RBP: ffff97de597a3ad8 R08: 0000000000000008 R09: 0000000000000000
>>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 00000000ffffffff
>>> R13: ffff97de5aa20c00 R14: 00000000000002f0 R15: ffff97e65dce0e00
>>> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff97e67f200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>> CR2: 00007f0e4e1ec000 CR3: 0000000078c06000 CR4: 00000000001406e0Stack:
>>> ffff97de597a3b50 0000000000001000 0000000000000000 ffff97dd227e4c80
>>> ffff97de5aa20c00 00000000000002f0 ffff97e65dce0e00 ffff97de597a3ba0
>>> ffffffffc02595db ffffffffc025e04b 00000001597a3b01 0000000200000006
>>> Call Trace:
>>> [<ffffffffc02595db>] ops_run_io+0x3bb/0x990 [raid456]
>>> [<ffffffffc025e04b>] ? raid_run_ops+0xefb/0x1520 [raid456]
>>> [<ffffffffc0261d16>] handle_stripe+0x9a6/0x2280 [raid456]
>>> [<ffffffffbc0ae6b2>] ? default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
>>> [<ffffffffbc0c7d22>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x12/0x40
>>> [<ffffffffc0263783>] handle_active_stripes.isra.54+0x193/0x4b0 [raid456]
>>> [<ffffffffc02571d5>] ? __release_stripe+0x15/0x20 [raid456]
>>> [<ffffffffc0263f49>] raid5d+0x4a9/0x740 [raid456]
>>> [<ffffffffbc0e88f0>] ? init_timer_key+0xa0/0xa0
>>> [<ffffffffc019a7eb>] md_thread+0x12b/0x130 [md_mod]
>>> [<ffffffffbc0c7d10>] ? wait_woken+0x90/0x90
>>> [<ffffffffc019a6c0>] ? find_pers+0x70/0x70 [md_mod]
>>> [<ffffffffbc0a395b>] kthread+0xdb/0x100
>>> [<ffffffffbc6de57f>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
>>> [<ffffffffbc0a3880>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
>>> Code: bd 70 08 00 00 f0 49 83 ad 70 08 00 00 01 74 05 e9 5a ff ff ff 41
>>> ff 95 80 08 00 00 e9 4e ff ff ff 48 c7 40 08 00 00 00 00 eb 8c <0f> 0b
>>> 66 66 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00
>>> RIP [<ffffffffbc3b3890>] generic_make_request+0x1c0/0x1d0
>>> RSP <ffff97de597a3aa0>
>>> ---[ end trace 457dbe5e9cdd3473 ]---
>>
>> CC'ing Shaohua - this is:
>>
>>         BUG_ON(bio->bi_next);
>>
>> which doesn't look healthy.
> 
> Hi Stefan,
> does below patch help? Looks there is a race condition introduced recently.

Yes this one fixes it.

Thanks.
Stefan

> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index b95c54c..ee7fc37 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -2423,10 +2423,10 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi)
>  		}
>  	}
>  	rdev_dec_pending(rdev, conf->mddev);
> +	bio_reset(bi);
>  	clear_bit(R5_LOCKED, &sh->dev[i].flags);
>  	set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
>  	raid5_release_stripe(sh);
> -	bio_reset(bi);
>  }
>  
>  static void raid5_end_write_request(struct bio *bi)
> @@ -2498,6 +2498,7 @@ static void raid5_end_write_request(struct bio *bi)
>  	if (sh->batch_head && bi->bi_error && !replacement)
>  		set_bit(STRIPE_BATCH_ERR, &sh->batch_head->state);
>  
> +	bio_reset(bi);
>  	if (!test_and_clear_bit(R5_DOUBLE_LOCKED, &sh->dev[i].flags))
>  		clear_bit(R5_LOCKED, &sh->dev[i].flags);
>  	set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
> @@ -2505,7 +2506,6 @@ static void raid5_end_write_request(struct bio *bi)
>  
>  	if (sh->batch_head && sh != sh->batch_head)
>  		raid5_release_stripe(sh->batch_head);
> -	bio_reset(bi);
>  }
>  
>  static void raid5_build_block(struct stripe_head *sh, int i, int previous)
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux