Hello.
On 8/12/2016 5:36 PM, Tom Yan wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index be9c76c..4e2d8e7 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -1204,14 +1204,26 @@ static int ata_scsi_dev_config(struct scsi_device
*sdev,
if (!ata_id_has_unload(dev->id))
dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_NO_UNLOAD;
- /* configure max sectors */
- blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(q, dev->max_sectors);
-
if (dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATAPI) {
void *buf;
sdev->sector_size = ATA_SECT_SIZE;
+ /*
+ * We are setting the limit here merely because CD/DVD
device does not
+ * have Block Limits VPD.
+ *
+ * Supposedly dev->max_sectors should be left shifted by
+ * (ilog2(sdev->sector_size) - 9). But since ATAPI class
device has a
+ * static logical sector size of 512 (ATA_SECT_SIZE), the
shift became
+ * unnecessary.
+ */
+ q->limits.max_dev_sectors = dev->max_sectors;
+ /* Make max_dev_sectors effective by adjusting max_sectors
accordingly,
+ while leave max_hw_sectors, which is supposed to be
host controller
+ limit, untouched. */
Why 2 different comment styles? The previous comment's style is actually
preferred in the kernel.
I just tried to follow the styles of the existing comments. Apparently
the first style is used for multi-paragraph comments, while the other
one is used for single-paragraph one.
Nevertheless, only the 1st comment is formatted in the preferred manner;
see Documentation/CodingStyle, chapter 8.
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
