Re: fix loop discard regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/05/2016 01:39 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:55:26PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
The first patch fixes a regression where discard request were accidentally
marked as aio after the req_op conversion.  This would have been mostly
harmless except for the god-awful parsing of request types later in the
actual I/O handler which turns them into a write, so the second patch
rewrites that handler using a proper switch statement as well.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Tested-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Also, your 2nd patch is missing a signed-off-by.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

in case that Jens wants to bother with force-updating the tree.

Not really, was hoping to flush it out today. Don't see it as a huge
problem...


--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux