On 08/01/2016 09:17 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/01/2016 05:47 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 04:45:48PM -0500, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
bi_rw should be using bio_set_op_attrs to set bi_rw.
Looks fine,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Added, thanks Shaun.
Jens,
what do you think about renaming bi_rw? There aren't too many users
left, and any old code that would keep using it is alsmost guranteed
to be broken, so sending a post-rc1 patch to rename it might make
everyone else life easier. Especially as it's also grossly misnamed
now.
I was planning on doing that, after -rc1. Much better to get build
breakage, than potentially much worse breakage.
Set of three patches, where the target one is an actual bug fix...
Temporary branch, I'll rebase it once -rc1 is out, if more
changes/fixups need to be made in the next week until that happens.
http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=for-4.8/bi_rwf
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
