On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:30:19PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 05:39:33PM +0900, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > @@ -1575,6 +1546,7 @@ static int nvme_dev_add(struct nvme_dev *dev) > > dev->tagset.cmd_size = nvme_cmd_size(dev); > > dev->tagset.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE; > > dev->tagset.driver_data = dev; > > + dev->tagset.affinity_mask = to_pci_dev(dev->dev)->irq_affinity; > > > > if (blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(&dev->tagset)) > > return 0; > > Are there any post-init uses of blk_mq_tag_set::affinity_mask other than > calling to blk_mq_alloc_tag_set()? If no, blk_mq_tag_set::affinity_mask > is redundant, since the mask could be passed as a parameter. We'll have to look at it in the block code when reinitializing rebuilding the queue topology. This isn't currently done, but we'll need it rather soon. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
