On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 11:35:28AM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > mq_map is initialized to zero already, so we don't really need the
> > assignment for queue 0. The reason why this check exists is because
> > we start with queue = -1 and we never want to assignment -1 to mq_map.
>
> Would this read better then?
>
> int queue = 0;
>
> ...
>
> /* If cpus are offline, map them to first hctx */
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> set->mq_map[cpu] = queue;
> if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, affinity_mask))
> queue++;
It would read better, but I don't think it's actually correct.
We'd still assign the 'old' queue to the cpu that is set in the affinity
mask.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
