Re: [PATCH] block: introduce BLKDEV_DISCARD_ZERO to fix zeroout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes:

>> >  	if (flags & BLKDEV_DISCARD_SECURE) {
>> > +		if (flags & BLKDEV_DISCARD_ZERO)
>> > +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> 
>> Should this be -EINVAL?
>
> BLKDEV_DISCARD_SECURE | BLKDEV_DISCARD_ZERO seems like a theoretically
> possible case, but I don't really care..

I agree, that is a possible combination.  EOPNOTSUPP is fine.

-Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux