On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:45:55AM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Is my interpretation correct that for an adapter that supports two > interrupts and on a system with eight CPU cores and no hyperthreading this > patch series will assign interrupt vector 0 to CPU 0 and interrupt vector 1 > to CPU 1? Yes - same as the existing blk-mq queue distribution. > Are you aware that drivers like ib_srp assume that interrupts > have been spread evenly, that means assigning vector 0 to CPU 0 and vector > 1 to CPU 4? which will make them run into a conflict with the current blk-mq assignment. That's exactly the point why we're trying to move things to a core location so that everyone can use the same mapping. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
