On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:36:54PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Sorry that I had not yet this made this clear but my concern is about a > system equipped with two or more adapters and with more CPU cores than the > number of MSI-X interrupts per adapter. Consider e.g. a system with two > adapters (A and B), 8 interrupts per adapter (A0..A7 and B0..B7), 32 CPU > cores and two NUMA nodes. Assuming that hyperthreading is disabled, will the > patches from this patch series generate the following interrupt assignment? > > 0: A0 B0 > 1: A1 B1 > 2: A2 B2 > 3: A3 B3 > 4: A4 B4 > 5: A5 B5 > 6: A6 B6 > 7: A7 B7 > 8: (none) > ... > 31: (none) I'll need to look at the follow on patches do to confirm, but that's not what this should do. All CPU's should have a vector assigned because every CPU needs to be assigned a submission context using a vector. In your example, every vector's affinity mask should be assigned to 4 CPUs: vector '8' starts over with A0 B0, '9' gets A1 B1, and so on. If it's done such that all CPUs are assigned and no sharing occurs across NUMA nodes, does that change your concern? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
