> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 06:03:51PM -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > > The above nvmet cm event handler, nvmet_rdma_cm_handler(), calls > > nvmet_rdma_queue_connect() for CONNECT_REQUEST events, which calls > > nvmet_rdma_alloc_queue (), which, if it encounters a failure (like creating > > the qp), calls nvmet_rdma_cm_reject () which calls rdma_reject(). The > > non-zero error, however, gets returned back here and this function returns > > the error to the RDMA_CM which will also reject the connection as well as > > destroy the cm_id. So there are two rejects happening, I think. Either > > nvmet should reject and destroy the cm_id, or it should do neither and > > return non-zero to the RDMA_CM to reject/destroy. > > Can you just send a patch? Yes, I'll send it out in a separate email. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
