Re: [PATCH V2] block: correctly fallback for zeroout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Shaohua" == Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx> writes:

Shaohua,

>> What does the extra io_err buy us? Just have this function return an
>> error. And then in blkdev_issue_discard if you get -EOPNOTSUPP you
>> special case it there.

Shaohua> The __blkdev_issue_discard returns -EOPNOTSUPP if disk doesn't
Shaohua> support discard.  in that case, blkdev_issue_discard doesn't
Shaohua> return 0. blkdev_issue_discard only returns 0 if IO error is
Shaohua> -EOPNOTSUPP.

Oh, I see. The sanity checks are now in __blkdev_issue_discard() so
there is no way to distinguish between -EOPNOTSUPP and the other
-EOPNOTSUPP. *sigh*

I am OK with your patch as a stable fix but this really needs to be
fixed up properly.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux