Re: [PATCH] cfq: priority boost on meta/prio marked IO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/09/2016 04:04 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

I went and checked, but I don't see it. Where is this?

Ah now I see, you're looking at current -git. The patch is against
for-4.8/core.

Ah, right, Mike's patches went in.

Updated version below, dropping REQ_META and changing the naming
s/meta/prio.

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 32a283eb7274..3cfd67d006fb 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1781,6 +1781,11 @@ get_rq:
  		rw_flags |= REQ_SYNC;

  	/*
+	 * Add in META/PRIO flags, if set, before we get to the IO scheduler
+	 */
+	rw_flags |= (bio->bi_rw & (REQ_META | REQ_PRIO));
+
+	/*

Do we still need to pass in META here?

We don't have to, but it doesn't really hurt. Frankly, we should pass in the whole damn thing.

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux