On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:38:55PM -0400, Keith Busch wrote: > For patch ordering, I had thought there were no issues with these > I submitted: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2016-May/004704.html > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2016-May/004709.html > > It's the ones adding the SCHED_RESET state to fixup synchronizing > continuous user initiated resets, and think it should still go in for 4.7. > There will be a minor conflict with 10/10 in this set it does go first. The 4.8 tree has forked already. I'm fine with adding these to 4.7, but we'll also need them in 4.8 going forward. Jens: are you fine with merging them for 4.7 for now, and merging them for 4.8 separately once I've finished the fabrics bits? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
