Comments inlined.
In general the most concerning bit is the need for memory allocation in
the IO path (see comment/question below near call to sg_alloc_table).
In DM targets we make heavy use of .ctr preallocated memory and/or
per-bio-data to avoid memory allocations in the IO path.
On Wed, May 25 2016 at 2:12am -0400,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In now dm-crypt code, it is ineffective to map one segment (always one
> sector) of one bio with just only one scatterlist at one time for hardware
> crypto engine. Especially for some encryption mode (like ecb or xts mode)
> cooperating with the crypto engine, they just need one initial IV or null
> IV instead of different IV for each sector. In this situation We can consider
> to use multiple scatterlists to map the whole bio and send all scatterlists
> of one bio to crypto engine to encrypt or decrypt, which can improve the
> hardware engine's efficiency.
>
> With this optimization, On my test setup (beaglebone black board) using 64KB
> I/Os on an eMMC storage device I saw about 60% improvement in throughput for
> encrypted writes, and about 100% improvement for encrypted reads. But this
> is not fit for other modes which need different IV for each sector.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-crypt.c | 188 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 176 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> index 4f3cb35..1c86ea7 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> #include <linux/device-mapper.h>
>
> #define DM_MSG_PREFIX "crypt"
> +#define DM_MAX_SG_LIST 1024
>
> /*
> * context holding the current state of a multi-part conversion
> @@ -46,6 +47,8 @@ struct convert_context {
> sector_t cc_sector;
> atomic_t cc_pending;
> struct skcipher_request *req;
> + struct sg_table sgt_in;
> + struct sg_table sgt_out;
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -803,6 +806,108 @@ static struct crypt_iv_operations crypt_iv_tcw_ops = {
> .post = crypt_iv_tcw_post
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Check how many sg entry numbers are needed when map one bio
> + * with scatterlists in advance.
> + */
> +static unsigned int crypt_sg_entry(struct bio *bio_t)
> +{
> + struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bio_t->bi_bdev);
> + int cluster = blk_queue_cluster(q);
> + struct bio_vec bvec, bvprv = { NULL };
> + struct bvec_iter biter;
> + unsigned long nbytes = 0, sg_length = 0;
> + unsigned int sg_cnt = 0, first_bvec = 0;
> +
> + if (bio_t->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD) {
> + if (bio_t->bi_vcnt)
> + return 1;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (bio_t->bi_rw & REQ_WRITE_SAME)
> + return 1;
> +
> + bio_for_each_segment(bvec, bio_t, biter) {
> + nbytes = bvec.bv_len;
> +
> + if (!cluster) {
> + sg_cnt++;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + if (!first_bvec) {
> + first_bvec = 1;
> + goto new_segment;
> + }
> +
> + if (sg_length + nbytes > queue_max_segment_size(q))
> + goto new_segment;
> +
> + if (!BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE(&bvprv, &bvec))
> + goto new_segment;
> +
> + if (!BIOVEC_SEG_BOUNDARY(q, &bvprv, &bvec))
> + goto new_segment;
> +
> + sg_length += nbytes;
> + continue;
> +
> +new_segment:
> + memcpy(&bvprv, &bvec, sizeof(struct bio_vec));
> + sg_length = nbytes;
> + sg_cnt++;
> + }
> +
> + return sg_cnt;
> +}
> +
> +static int crypt_convert_alloc_table(struct crypt_config *cc,
> + struct convert_context *ctx)
> +{
> + struct bio *bio_in = ctx->bio_in;
> + struct bio *bio_out = ctx->bio_out;
> + unsigned int mode = skcipher_is_bulk_mode(any_tfm(cc));
please use: bool bulk_mode = ...
> + unsigned int sg_in_max, sg_out_max;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!mode)
> + goto out2;
Please use more descriptive label names than out[1-3]
> +
> + /*
> + * Need to calculate how many sg entry need to be used
> + * for this bio.
> + */
> + sg_in_max = crypt_sg_entry(bio_in) + 1;
The return from crypt_sg_entry() is pretty awkward, given you just go on
to add 1; as is the bounds checking.. the magic value of 2 needs to be
be made clearer.
> + if (sg_in_max > DM_MAX_SG_LIST || sg_in_max <= 2)
> + goto out2;
> +
> + ret = sg_alloc_table(&ctx->sgt_in, sg_in_max, GFP_KERNEL);
Is it safe to be using GFP_KERNEL here? AFAIK this is in the IO mapping
path and we try to avoid memory allocations at all costs -- due to the
risk of deadlock when issuing IO to stacked block devices (dm-crypt
could be part of a much more elaborate IO stack).
> + if (ret)
> + goto out2;
> +
> + if (bio_data_dir(bio_in) == READ)
> + goto out1;
> +
> + sg_out_max = crypt_sg_entry(bio_out) + 1;
> + if (sg_out_max > DM_MAX_SG_LIST || sg_out_max <= 2)
> + goto out3;
> +
> + ret = sg_alloc_table(&ctx->sgt_out, sg_out_max, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out3;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +out3:
out_free_table?
> + sg_free_table(&ctx->sgt_in);
> +out2:
out_skip_alloc?
> + ctx->sgt_in.orig_nents = 0;
> +out1:
out_skip_write?
> + ctx->sgt_out.orig_nents = 0;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static void crypt_convert_init(struct crypt_config *cc,
> struct convert_context *ctx,
> struct bio *bio_out, struct bio *bio_in,
> @@ -843,7 +948,13 @@ static int crypt_convert_block(struct crypt_config *cc,
> {
> struct bio_vec bv_in = bio_iter_iovec(ctx->bio_in, ctx->iter_in);
> struct bio_vec bv_out = bio_iter_iovec(ctx->bio_out, ctx->iter_out);
> + unsigned int mode = skcipher_is_bulk_mode(any_tfm(cc));
again please use: bool bulk_mode = ...
> + struct bio *bio_in = ctx->bio_in;
> + struct bio *bio_out = ctx->bio_out;
> + unsigned int total_bytes = bio_in->bi_iter.bi_size;
> struct dm_crypt_request *dmreq;
> + struct scatterlist *sg_in;
> + struct scatterlist *sg_out;
> u8 *iv;
> int r;
>
> @@ -852,16 +963,6 @@ static int crypt_convert_block(struct crypt_config *cc,
>
> dmreq->iv_sector = ctx->cc_sector;
> dmreq->ctx = ctx;
> - sg_init_table(&dmreq->sg_in, 1);
> - sg_set_page(&dmreq->sg_in, bv_in.bv_page, 1 << SECTOR_SHIFT,
> - bv_in.bv_offset);
> -
> - sg_init_table(&dmreq->sg_out, 1);
> - sg_set_page(&dmreq->sg_out, bv_out.bv_page, 1 << SECTOR_SHIFT,
> - bv_out.bv_offset);
> -
> - bio_advance_iter(ctx->bio_in, &ctx->iter_in, 1 << SECTOR_SHIFT);
> - bio_advance_iter(ctx->bio_out, &ctx->iter_out, 1 << SECTOR_SHIFT);
>
> if (cc->iv_gen_ops) {
> r = cc->iv_gen_ops->generator(cc, iv, dmreq);
> @@ -869,8 +970,63 @@ static int crypt_convert_block(struct crypt_config *cc,
> return r;
> }
>
> - skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &dmreq->sg_in, &dmreq->sg_out,
> - 1 << SECTOR_SHIFT, iv);
> + if (mode && ctx->sgt_in.orig_nents > 0) {
> + struct scatterlist *sg = NULL;
> + unsigned int total_sg_in, total_sg_out;
> +
> + total_sg_in = blk_bio_map_sg(bdev_get_queue(bio_in->bi_bdev),
> + bio_in, ctx->sgt_in.sgl, &sg);
> + if ((total_sg_in <= 0) ||
> + (total_sg_in > ctx->sgt_in.orig_nents)) {
> + DMERR("%s in sg map error %d, sg table nents[%d]\n",
> + __func__, total_sg_in, ctx->sgt_in.orig_nents);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (sg)
> + sg_mark_end(sg);
> +
> + ctx->iter_in.bi_size -= total_bytes;
> + sg_in = ctx->sgt_in.sgl;
> + sg_out = ctx->sgt_in.sgl;
> +
> + if (bio_data_dir(bio_in) == READ)
> + goto set_crypt;
> +
> + sg = NULL;
> + total_sg_out = blk_bio_map_sg(bdev_get_queue(bio_out->bi_bdev),
> + bio_out, ctx->sgt_out.sgl, &sg);
> + if ((total_sg_out <= 0) ||
> + (total_sg_out > ctx->sgt_out.orig_nents)) {
> + DMERR("%s out sg map error %d, sg table nents[%d]\n",
> + __func__, total_sg_out, ctx->sgt_out.orig_nents);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (sg)
> + sg_mark_end(sg);
> +
> + ctx->iter_out.bi_size -= total_bytes;
> + sg_out = ctx->sgt_out.sgl;
> + } else {
> + sg_init_table(&dmreq->sg_in, 1);
> + sg_set_page(&dmreq->sg_in, bv_in.bv_page, 1 << SECTOR_SHIFT,
> + bv_in.bv_offset);
> +
> + sg_init_table(&dmreq->sg_out, 1);
> + sg_set_page(&dmreq->sg_out, bv_out.bv_page, 1 << SECTOR_SHIFT,
> + bv_out.bv_offset);
> +
> + bio_advance_iter(ctx->bio_in, &ctx->iter_in, 1 << SECTOR_SHIFT);
> + bio_advance_iter(ctx->bio_out, &ctx->iter_out, 1 << SECTOR_SHIFT);
> +
> + sg_in = &dmreq->sg_in;
> + sg_out = &dmreq->sg_out;
> + total_bytes = 1 << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> + }
> +
> +set_crypt:
> + skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, sg_in, sg_out, total_bytes, iv);
Given how long this code has gotten I'd prefer to see this factored out
to a new setup method.
> if (bio_data_dir(ctx->bio_in) == WRITE)
> r = crypto_skcipher_encrypt(req);
> @@ -1081,6 +1237,8 @@ static void crypt_dec_pending(struct dm_crypt_io *io)
> if (io->ctx.req)
> crypt_free_req(cc, io->ctx.req, base_bio);
>
> + sg_free_table(&io->ctx.sgt_in);
> + sg_free_table(&io->ctx.sgt_out);
> base_bio->bi_error = error;
> bio_endio(base_bio);
> }
> @@ -1312,6 +1470,9 @@ static void kcryptd_crypt_write_convert(struct dm_crypt_io *io)
> io->ctx.iter_out = clone->bi_iter;
>
> sector += bio_sectors(clone);
> + r = crypt_convert_alloc_table(cc, &io->ctx);
> + if (r < 0)
> + io->error = -EIO;
>
> crypt_inc_pending(io);
> r = crypt_convert(cc, &io->ctx);
> @@ -1343,6 +1504,9 @@ static void kcryptd_crypt_read_convert(struct dm_crypt_io *io)
>
> crypt_convert_init(cc, &io->ctx, io->base_bio, io->base_bio,
> io->sector);
> + r = crypt_convert_alloc_table(cc, &io->ctx);
> + if (r < 0)
> + io->error = -EIO;
>
> r = crypt_convert(cc, &io->ctx);
> if (r < 0)
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
