Re: [PATCH 8/8] writeback: throttle buffered writeback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 40b57bf4852c..d941f69dfb4b 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>  
>  #include "blk.h"
>  #include "blk-mq.h"
> +#include "blk-wb.h"
>  
>  EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(block_bio_remap);
>  EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(block_rq_remap);
> @@ -880,6 +881,7 @@ blk_init_allocated_queue(struct request_queue *q, request_fn_proc *rfn,
>  
>  fail:
>  	blk_free_flush_queue(q->fq);
> +	blk_wb_exit(q);
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_init_allocated_queue);
> @@ -1395,6 +1397,7 @@ void blk_requeue_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
>  	blk_delete_timer(rq);
>  	blk_clear_rq_complete(rq);
>  	trace_block_rq_requeue(q, rq);
> +	blk_wb_requeue(q->rq_wb, rq);
>  
>  	if (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_QUEUED)
>  		blk_queue_end_tag(q, rq);
> @@ -1485,6 +1488,8 @@ void __blk_put_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req)
>  	/* this is a bio leak */
>  	WARN_ON(req->bio != NULL);
>  
> +	blk_wb_done(q->rq_wb, req);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Request may not have originated from ll_rw_blk. if not,
>  	 * it didn't come out of our reserved rq pools
> @@ -1714,6 +1719,7 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_queue_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  	int el_ret, rw_flags, where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_SORT;
>  	struct request *req;
>  	unsigned int request_count = 0;
> +	bool wb_acct;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * low level driver can indicate that it wants pages above a
> @@ -1766,6 +1772,8 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_queue_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  	}
>  
>  get_rq:
> +	wb_acct = blk_wb_wait(q->rq_wb, bio, q->queue_lock);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * This sync check and mask will be re-done in init_request_from_bio(),
>  	 * but we need to set it earlier to expose the sync flag to the
> @@ -1781,11 +1789,16 @@ get_rq:
>  	 */
>  	req = get_request(q, rw_flags, bio, GFP_NOIO);
>  	if (IS_ERR(req)) {
> +		if (wb_acct)
> +			__blk_wb_done(q->rq_wb);
>  		bio->bi_error = PTR_ERR(req);
>  		bio_endio(bio);
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (wb_acct)
> +		req->cmd_flags |= REQ_BUF_INFLIGHT;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * After dropping the lock and possibly sleeping here, our request
>  	 * may now be mergeable after it had proven unmergeable (above).
> @@ -2515,6 +2528,7 @@ void blk_start_request(struct request *req)
>  	blk_dequeue_request(req);
>  
>  	req->issue_time = ktime_to_ns(ktime_get());
> +	blk_wb_issue(req->q->rq_wb, req);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We are now handing the request to the hardware, initialize
> @@ -2751,6 +2765,7 @@ void blk_finish_request(struct request *req, int error)
>  		blk_unprep_request(req);
>  
>  	blk_account_io_done(req);
> +	blk_wb_done(req->q->rq_wb, req);

Hi Jens,

Seems the function blk_wb_done() will be executed twice even if the end_io
callback is set.
Maybe the same thing would happen in blk-mq.c.

>  
>  	if (req->end_io)
>  		req->end_io(req, error);
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 71b4a13fbf94..c0c5207fe7fd 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>  #include "blk-mq.h"
>  #include "blk-mq-tag.h"
>  #include "blk-stat.h"
> +#include "blk-wb.h"
>  
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(all_q_mutex);
>  static LIST_HEAD(all_q_list);
> @@ -275,6 +276,9 @@ static void __blk_mq_free_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>  
>  	if (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_MQ_INFLIGHT)
>  		atomic_dec(&hctx->nr_active);
> +
> +	blk_wb_done(q->rq_wb, rq);
> +
>  	rq->cmd_flags = 0;
>  
>  	clear_bit(REQ_ATOM_STARTED, &rq->atomic_flags);
> @@ -305,6 +309,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_free_request);
>  inline void __blk_mq_end_request(struct request *rq, int error)
>  {
>  	blk_account_io_done(rq);
> +	blk_wb_done(rq->q->rq_wb, rq);
>  
>  	if (rq->end_io) {
>  		rq->end_io(rq, error);
> @@ -414,6 +419,7 @@ void blk_mq_start_request(struct request *rq)
>  		rq->next_rq->resid_len = blk_rq_bytes(rq->next_rq);
>  
>  	rq->issue_time = ktime_to_ns(ktime_get());
> +	blk_wb_issue(q->rq_wb, rq);
>  
>  	blk_add_timer(rq);
>  
> @@ -450,6 +456,7 @@ static void __blk_mq_requeue_request(struct request *rq)
>  	struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
>  
>  	trace_block_rq_requeue(q, rq);
> +	blk_wb_requeue(q->rq_wb, rq);
>  
>  	if (test_and_clear_bit(REQ_ATOM_STARTED, &rq->atomic_flags)) {
>  		if (q->dma_drain_size && blk_rq_bytes(rq))
> @@ -1265,6 +1272,7 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_mq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  	struct blk_plug *plug;
>  	struct request *same_queue_rq = NULL;
>  	blk_qc_t cookie;
> +	bool wb_acct;
>  
>  	blk_queue_bounce(q, &bio);
>  
> @@ -1282,9 +1290,17 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_mq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  	} else
>  		request_count = blk_plug_queued_count(q);
>  
> +	wb_acct = blk_wb_wait(q->rq_wb, bio, NULL);
> +
>  	rq = blk_mq_map_request(q, bio, &data);
> -	if (unlikely(!rq))
> +	if (unlikely(!rq)) {
> +		if (wb_acct)
> +			__blk_wb_done(q->rq_wb);
>  		return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (wb_acct)
> +		rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_BUF_INFLIGHT;
>  
>  	cookie = blk_tag_to_qc_t(rq->tag, data.hctx->queue_num);
>  
> @@ -1361,6 +1377,7 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_sq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  	struct blk_map_ctx data;
>  	struct request *rq;
>  	blk_qc_t cookie;
> +	bool wb_acct;
>  
>  	blk_queue_bounce(q, &bio);
>  
> @@ -1375,9 +1392,17 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_sq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  	    blk_attempt_plug_merge(q, bio, &request_count, NULL))
>  		return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
>  
> +	wb_acct = blk_wb_wait(q->rq_wb, bio, NULL);
> +
>  	rq = blk_mq_map_request(q, bio, &data);
> -	if (unlikely(!rq))
> +	if (unlikely(!rq)) {
> +		if (wb_acct)
> +			__blk_wb_done(q->rq_wb);
>  		return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (wb_acct)
> +		rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_BUF_INFLIGHT;
>  
>  	cookie = blk_tag_to_qc_t(rq->tag, data.hctx->queue_num);
>  
> @@ -2111,6 +2136,8 @@ void blk_mq_free_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>  	list_del_init(&q->all_q_node);



-- 
Regards
Kaixu Xia

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux