Re: [PATCH 7/9] block: Introduce BLKPREP_DONE

[Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 04/04/2016 03:00 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> @@ -2460,9 +2460,13 @@ struct request *blk_peek_request(struct request_queue *q)
>
>   			rq = NULL;
>   			break;
> -		} else if (ret == BLKPREP_KILL || ret == BLKPREP_INVALID) {
> +		} else if (ret == BLKPREP_KILL || ret == BLKPREP_INVALID ||
> +			   ret == BLKPREP_DONE) {
>   			int err = (ret == BLKPREP_INVALID) ? -EREMOTEIO : -EIO;
>
> +			if (ret == BLKPREP_DONE)
> +				err = 0;
> +
>   			rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_QUIET;
>   			/*
>   			 * Mark this request as started so we don't trigger

Hello Hannes,

How about using a switch/case statement to translate BLKPREP_* into an 
error code?

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html