Re: [PATCH 2/9] block: update chunk_sectors in blk_stack_limits()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/04/16 03:00, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index c7bb666..29fa900 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -630,6 +630,9 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,
  			t->discard_granularity;
  	}

+	if (b->chunk_sectors)
+		t->chunk_sectors = max(t->chunk_sectors, b->chunk_sectors);
+
  	return ret;
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_stack_limits);

Hello Hannes,

My understanding is that a non-zero chunk_sectors value defines a maximum I/O size. Shouldn't max() be changed into min_not_zero()? From include/linux/blkdev.h:

static inline unsigned int blk_max_size_offset(struct request_queue *q,
					       sector_t offset)
{
	if (!q->limits.chunk_sectors)
		return q->limits.max_sectors;

	return q->limits.chunk_sectors -
			(offset & (q->limits.chunk_sectors - 1));
}

Bart.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux