On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 03:54:22PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:39:47AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Btw, can someone explain why you guys waste so much time hacking and > > arguing about a legacy codebase (old request code and I/O schedulers) > > that everyone would really like to see disappear. Why don't you > > spend your time on blk-mq where you have an entirely clean slate > > for scheduling? > idk, are we gonna duplicate a full disk scheduler on blk-mq path? I > think it'd be more sensible to make blk-mq call into the old elevator > path for scheduling IOs on rotating rusts. It's not just rust, it's also lower end solid state devices.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
