Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] dm mpath: vastly improve blk-mq IO performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 08 2016 at  7:42am -0400,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ladies and Gentlemen,
> To show off some numbers from our testing:
> 
> All tests are performed against the cache of the Array, not the disks as we 
> wanted to test the Linux stack not the Disk Array.
> 
> All single queue tests have been performed with the deadline I/O Scheduler.
> 
> Comments welcome, have fun reading :-)

Any chance you collected performance results from DM MQ on this same
testbed without any variant of my lockless patches?  The DM SQ results
aren't too interesting a reference point.  Seeing how much better
lockless DM MQ (multipath) is than the old m->lock heacy code (still in
4.6) would be more interesting.

Not a big deal if you don't have it.. but figured I'd check to see.

And thanks for the numbers you've provided.
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux