Re: [PATCH 0/2] Block: Give option to force io polling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 05:38:32AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:19:12PM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > In 4.6, enabling io polling in direct-io was switched to a per-io flag.
> > This had an unintended result of giving a significant difference when
> > doing benchmarks between 4.5 and 4.6, using fio's sync engine.
> 
> Only if you manually enabled polling beforehand.  I really don't see
> how this is going to be useful for actual applications vs benchmarks,
> so I'll need more convincing arguments.

I think it's more about providing opt-in control to make the low-latency
benefit reachable to users with existing programs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux