Re: [PATCH RFC 09/22] block, cfq: replace CFQ with the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Btw, can someone explain why you guys waste so much time hacking and
> arguing about a legacy codebase (old request code and I/O schedulers)
> that everyone would really like to see disappear.  Why don't you
> spend your time on blk-mq where you have an entirely clean slate
> for scheduling?

Depends on what time horizon and target I'd say. Paolo was in contact with
the MMC/SD subsystem maintainer Ulf Hansson. (e)MMC/SD are both
synchronous command-response-based protocols, and as of today
single-channel. So everone's smartphone and tablet etc are today
single-channel. I don't know if there is even a protocol change coming
to augment this, the only duct-tapeish solution I've heard about is
command queueing which is basically a kind of pipelining of requests.

So: large userbase in all things handheld.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux