Re: [PATCH 5/7] direct-io: only use block polling if explicitly requested

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  fs/direct-io.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
> index d6a9012..0a8d937 100644
> --- a/fs/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/direct-io.c
> @@ -445,7 +445,8 @@ static struct bio *dio_await_one(struct dio *dio)
>  		__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>  		dio->waiter = current;
>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dio->bio_lock, flags);
> -		if (!blk_poll(bdev_get_queue(dio->bio_bdev), dio->bio_cookie))
> +		if (!(dio->iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI) ||
> +		    !blk_poll(bdev_get_queue(dio->bio_bdev), dio->bio_cookie))
>  			io_schedule();
>  		/* wake up sets us TASK_RUNNING */
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(&dio->bio_lock, flags);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux