On 02/09/2016 10:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Does this looks reasonable? --- From 7843fae979df3fc14007735f54cc6bb2f6f66dc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:11:32 +0100 Subject: nvme: fix Kconfig description for BLK_DEV_NVME_SCSI Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> --- drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig b/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig index 59307f8..2e24156 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/Kconfig @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ config BLK_DEV_NVME_SCSI and block devices nodes, as well a a translation for a small number of selected SCSI commands to NVMe commands to the NVMe driver. If you don't know what this means you probably want - to say N here, and if you know what it means you probably - want to say N as well. + to say N here, unless you run a distro that abuses this for + stable device names like some OpenSuSE and SLES versions.
Yep, that looks a lot more reasonable to me. Might be wort including that it impacts the mount-by-id on those distros.
-- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
