Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] IO cost estimation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:40:33PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> To implement meaningful IO resource accounting and distribution, it's
> necessary to know how much each IO or a group of IOs costs.  With
> rotational devices, due to the inherent low performance and
> concurrency, direct IO cost estimation could be replaced with
> provisioning time slices - whatever compositions of IOs which can be
> performed in the same amount time are of the same cost.  However, this
> approach can no longer be used for modern non-rotational
> high-performance devices with high level of concurrency.
> 
> It'd be great to talk about the problem, how to work around the
> problem in the near future, and what solutions can be employed in the
> long term.

Definitely interested in this topic. It's not a new problm, NCQ hard
disk has the issue too, CFQ isn't very fair for NCQ disk.

Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux