[PATCH RFC] blk-mq: no need to modify bt->wake_index if someone has updated it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If someone else has found active waitqueue and updated
bt->wake_index, do not modify it again. This saves an
atomic read.

Signed-off-by: Wenbo Wang <mail_weber_wang@xxxxxxx>
CC: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
 block/blk-mq-tag.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index abdbb47..5ed9111 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -356,16 +356,15 @@ unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
 
 static struct bt_wait_state *bt_wake_ptr(struct blk_mq_bitmap_tags *bt)
 {
-	int i, wake_index;
+	int i, wake_index, orig_wake_index;
 
-	wake_index = atomic_read(&bt->wake_index);
+	orig_wake_index = wake_index = atomic_read(&bt->wake_index);
 	for (i = 0; i < BT_WAIT_QUEUES; i++) {
 		struct bt_wait_state *bs = &bt->bs[wake_index];
 
 		if (waitqueue_active(&bs->wait)) {
-			int o = atomic_read(&bt->wake_index);
-			if (wake_index != o)
-				atomic_cmpxchg(&bt->wake_index, o, wake_index);
+			if (wake_index != orig_wake_index)
+				atomic_cmpxchg(&bt->wake_index, orig_wake_index, wake_index);
 
 			return bs;
 		}
-- 
1.8.3.1
---
Not seeing too much benifit from this patch, but it makes the logic here more clear

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux