On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 06:47:23PM +0000, Keith Busch wrote: > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 09:44:57AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > This is the counter part to nvme_map_data. The forward declaration will > > go away later in the series. > > Generally, the whole series looks great, but we must be missing one or > more patches here. I don't see the "nvme_map_data" part, which I suspect > is why this patch and others fail to apply using linux-block/for-next. > Once I clear up which patches to apply to which tree, I'd like to run > this through a few test systems to make sure there won't be any surprises. I used your linux-nvme.git tree as base. I had to revert the Identify nslist changes for now as they break qemu testing, but that shouldn't have affected these patches. The full git tree is here: http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/block.git/shortlog/refs/heads/nvme-req.7 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
