On 11/24/23 9:34 AM, Coly Li wrote: > > >> 2023?11?25? 00:31?Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> ??? >> >> On 11/24/23 9:29 AM, Coly Li wrote: >>> >>> >>>> 2023?11?24? 23:14?Markus Weippert <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ??? >>>> >>>> Commit 028ddcac477b ("bcache: Remove unnecessary NULL point check in >>>> node allocations") replaced IS_ERR_OR_NULL by IS_ERR. This leads to a >>>> NULL pointer dereference. >>>> >>>> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000080 >>>> Call Trace: >>>> ? __die_body.cold+0x1a/0x1f >>>> ? page_fault_oops+0xd2/0x2b0 >>>> ? exc_page_fault+0x70/0x170 >>>> ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 >>>> ? btree_node_free+0xf/0x160 [bcache] >>>> ? up_write+0x32/0x60 >>>> btree_gc_coalesce+0x2aa/0x890 [bcache] >>>> ? bch_extent_bad+0x70/0x170 [bcache] >>>> btree_gc_recurse+0x130/0x390 [bcache] >>>> ? btree_gc_mark_node+0x72/0x230 [bcache] >>>> bch_btree_gc+0x5da/0x600 [bcache] >>>> ? cpuusage_read+0x10/0x10 >>>> ? bch_btree_gc+0x600/0x600 [bcache] >>>> bch_gc_thread+0x135/0x180 [bcache] >>>> >>>> The relevant code starts with: >>>> >>>> new_nodes[0] = NULL; >>>> >>>> for (i = 0; i < nodes; i++) { >>>> if (__bch_keylist_realloc(&keylist, bkey_u64s(&r[i].b->key))) >>>> goto out_nocoalesce; >>>> // ... >>>> out_nocoalesce: >>>> // ... >>>> for (i = 0; i < nodes; i++) >>>> if (!IS_ERR(new_nodes[i])) { // IS_ERR_OR_NULL before >>>> 028ddcac477b >>>> btree_node_free(new_nodes[i]); // new_nodes[0] is NULL >>>> rw_unlock(true, new_nodes[i]); >>>> } >>>> >>>> This patch replaces IS_ERR() by IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to fix this. >>>> >>>> Fixes: 028ddcac477b ("bcache: Remove unnecessary NULL point check in >>>> node allocations") >>>> Link: >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/3DF4A87A-2AC1-4893-AE5F-E921478419A9@xxxxxxx/ >>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Cc: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@xxxxxxx> >>>> Cc: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Weippert <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Added into my for-next. Thanks for patching up. >> >> We should probably get this into the current release, rather than punt >> it to 6.8. > > Yes, copied. So far I don?t have other bcache patches for 6.7, I feel > I might be redundant if I send you another for -rc4 series with this > single patch. > > Could you please directly take it into -rc4? Sure, I'll just grab it as-is. -- Jens Axboe