On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 11:04:44AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:47:27AM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote: > > Yes indeed - I was under the impression it was appropriate for a > > maintainer to signal their approval of a patch to maintained code using > > a Signed-off-by tag due to their involvement in the submission process? > > Apologies if I've got this wrong, happy to send Reviewed-bys by all > > means. > > Signed-off-by is for the chain that the patches pass through. You add > it when you apply or forward the patch. Just give me a Reviewed-by > tag and say it shold apply to patches 1 to 6 and I'll add it. Thanks for the guidance. Please apply the following to the block patch (1) and the CD-ROM patches (2-6) of your series, all looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Phillip Potter <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Phil
