Re: [RFC PATCH] block: add meaningful macro for flush op flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] block: add meaningful macro for flush op flags
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 15:00:42 +0200
Cc: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, colyli@xxxxxxx, kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx, agk@xxxxxxxxxx, snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, song@xxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230512080757.387523-1-kch@nvidia.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Hell no.  This is just obsfucation.  We can look into actually exposing
REQ_OP_FLUSH at the bio level, but not something like this.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH] block: add meaningful macro for flush op flags
  - From: Chaitanya Kulkarni

References:
- [RFC PATCH] block: add meaningful macro for flush op flags
  - From: Chaitanya Kulkarni

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] block: add meaningful macro for flush op flags
Next by Date: Re: Writeback cache all used.
Previous by thread: [RFC PATCH] block: add meaningful macro for flush op flags
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] block: add meaningful macro for flush op flags
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux