Re: bcache I/O performance tests on 5.15.0-40-generic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 25 Jun 2022, Coly Li wrote:
> > 2022年6月25日 14:29,Nikhil Kshirsagar <nkshirsagar@xxxxxxxxx> 写道:
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I've been doing some performance tests of bcache on 5.15.0-40-generic.
> > 
> > The baseline figures for the fast and slow disk for random writes are
> > consistent at around 225MiB/s and 3046KiB/s.
> > 
> > But the bcache results inexplicably drop sometimes to 10Mib/s, for
> > random write test using fio like this -
> > 
> > fio --rw=randwrite --size=1G --ioengine=libaio --direct=1
> > --gtod_reduce=1 --iodepth=128 --bs=4k --name=MY_TEST1
> > 
> >  WRITE: bw=168MiB/s (176MB/s), 168MiB/s-168MiB/s (176MB/s-176MB/s),
> > io=1024MiB (1074MB), run=6104-6104msec
> >  WRITE: bw=283MiB/s (297MB/s), 283MiB/s-283MiB/s (297MB/s-297MB/s),
> > io=1024MiB (1074MB), run=3621-3621msec
> >  WRITE: bw=10.3MiB/s (10.9MB/s), 10.3MiB/s-10.3MiB/s
> > (10.9MB/s-10.9MB/s), io=1024MiB (1074MB), run=98945-98945msec
> >  WRITE: bw=8236KiB/s (8434kB/s), 8236KiB/s-8236KiB/s
> > (8434kB/s-8434kB/s), io=1024MiB (1074MB), run=127317-127317msec
> >  WRITE: bw=9657KiB/s (9888kB/s), 9657KiB/s-9657KiB/s
> > (9888kB/s-9888kB/s), io=1024MiB (1074MB), run=108587-108587msec
> >  WRITE: bw=4543KiB/s (4652kB/s), 4543KiB/s-4543KiB/s
> > (4652kB/s-4652kB/s), io=1024MiB (1074MB), run=230819-230819msec
> > 
> > This seems to happen after 2 runs of 1gb writes (cache disk is 4gb size)
> > 
> > Some details are here - https://pastebin.com/V9mpLCbY , I will share
> > the full testing results soon, but just was wondering about this
> > performance drop for no apparent reason once the cache gets about 50%
> > full.
> 
> 
> It seems you are stuck by garbage collection. 4GB cache is small, the 
> garbage collection might be invoked quite frequently. Maybe you can see 
> the output of ’top -H’ to check whether there is kernel thread named 
> bache_gc.

Hi Nikhil,

Do you have Mingzhe's GC patch?  It might help:
  https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bcache/msg11185.html

Coli, did Mingzhe's patch get into your testing tree?  It looks like it 
could be a good addition to bcache.

--
Eric Wheeler



> 
> Anyway, 4GB cache is too small.
> 
> Coly Li
> 
> 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux