Hello all, I am trying to reproduce the problem that 32feee36c30ea06e38ccb8ae6e5c44c6eec790a6 fixes, but I am not sure how. This is to verify and test its backport (https://pastebin.com/fEYmPZqC) onto kernel 4.15 (Thanks Kent for the help with that backport!) Could this be reproduced by creating a bcache device with a smaller journal size? And if so, is there some way to pass the journal size argument during the creation of the bcache device? Regards, Nikhil.
