Re: [PATCH] bcache: avoid unnecessary soft lockup in kworker update_writeback_rate()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> The kworker routine update_writeback_rate() is schedued to update the
> writeback rate in every 5 seconds by default. Before calling
> __update_writeback_rate() to do real job, semaphore dc->writeback_lock
> should be held by the kworker routine.
>
> At the same time, bcache writeback thread routine bch_writeback_thread()
> also needs to hold dc->writeback_lock before flushing dirty data back
> into the backing device. If the dirty data set is large, it might be
> very long time for bch_writeback_thread() to scan all dirty buckets and
> releases dc->writeback_lock.

Hi Coly,
cached_dev_write() needs dc->writeback_lock, if  the writeback thread
 holds writeback_lock too long, high write IO latency may happen. I wonder
if it is a nicer way to limit the scale of the scanning in writeback.
For example,
just scan 512GB in stead of the whole cache disk。




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux