On 5/18/21 10:27 AM, Ma, Jianpeng wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 8:49 PM
>> To: Ren, Qiaowei <qiaowei.ren@xxxxxxxxx>; Ma, Jianpeng
>> <jianpeng.ma@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [bch-nvm-pages v9 4/6] bcache: bch_nvm_alloc_pages() of the
>> buddy
>>
>> On 4/29/21 5:39 AM, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
>>> From: Jianpeng Ma <jianpeng.ma@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> This patch implements the bch_nvm_alloc_pages() of the buddy.
>>> In terms of function, this func is like current-page-buddy-alloc.
>>> But the differences are:
>>> a: it need owner_uuid as parameter which record owner info. And it
>>> make those info persistence.
>>> b: it don't need flags like GFP_*. All allocs are the equal.
>>> c: it don't trigger other ops etc swap/recycle.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <jianpeng.ma@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Co-developed-by: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> [colyli: fix typo in commit log]
>>
>> Once you fixed the typo in this version, you may remove the above line from
>> this patch. Such comment is used when I submit patches to mainline kernel.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> And this is maintainer's SOB not author's, you may remove it from all rested
>> patches except for the first one of this series.
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/md/bcache/nvm-pages.c | 172
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/md/bcache/nvm-pages.h | 6 ++
>>> 2 files changed, 178 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/nvm-pages.c
>>> b/drivers/md/bcache/nvm-pages.c index 810f65cf756a..2647ff997fab
>>> 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/nvm-pages.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/nvm-pages.c
>>> @@ -68,6 +68,178 @@ static inline void remove_owner_space(struct
>> bch_nvm_namespace *ns,
>>> bitmap_set(ns->pages_bitmap, pgoff, nr); }
>>>
>>> +/* If not found, it will create if create == true */ static struct
>>> +bch_nvm_pages_owner_head *find_owner_head(const char
>> *owner_uuid,
>>> +bool create) {
>>> + struct bch_owner_list_head *owner_list_head = only_set-
>>> owner_list_head;
>>> + struct bch_nvm_pages_owner_head *owner_head = NULL;
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + if (owner_list_head == NULL)
>>> + goto out;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < only_set->owner_list_used; i++) {
>>> + if (!memcmp(owner_uuid, owner_list_head->heads[i].uuid, 16))
>> {
>>> + owner_head = &(owner_list_head->heads[i]);
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (!owner_head && create) {
>>> + int used = only_set->owner_list_used;
>>> +
>>> + BUG_ON((used > 0) && (only_set->owner_list_size == used));
>>
>>
>> It seems the above condition may happen when owner_list is full? Maybe
>> return NULL for a full-occupied owner header list can be better?
>>
>>
>>> + memcpy_flushcache(owner_list_head->heads[used].uuid,
>> owner_uuid, 16);
>>> + only_set->owner_list_used++;
>>> +
>>> + owner_list_head->used++;
>>> + owner_head = &(owner_list_head->heads[used]);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +out:
>>> + return owner_head;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static struct bch_nvm_pgalloc_recs *find_empty_pgalloc_recs(void) {
>>> + unsigned int start;
>>> + struct bch_nvm_namespace *ns = only_set->nss[0];
>>> + struct bch_nvm_pgalloc_recs *recs;
>>> +
>>> + start = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(ns->pgalloc_recs_bitmap,
>>> +BCH_MAX_PGALLOC_RECS, 0, 1, 0);
>>
>> We cannot assume all space in [BCH_NVM_PAGES_SYS_RECS_HEAD_OFFSET,
>> BCH_NVM_PAGES_OFFSET) are dedicated to recs structures.
>>
>> Right now each bch_nvm_pgalloc_recs is 8KB, we can assume the
>> BCH_MAX_PGALLOC_RECS to be 64, that means 512KB space starts at
>> BCH_NVM_PAGES_SYS_RECS_HEAD_OFFSET. we won't exceed the limition in
>> next
>> 12 months at least.
>>
>>
>>> + if (start > BCH_MAX_PGALLOC_RECS) {
>>> + pr_info("no free struct bch_nvm_pgalloc_recs\n");
>>> + return NULL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + bitmap_set(ns->pgalloc_recs_bitmap, start, 1);
>>> + recs = (struct bch_nvm_pgalloc_recs *)(ns->kaddr +
>> BCH_NVM_PAGES_SYS_RECS_HEAD_OFFSET)
>>> + + start;
>>> + return recs;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static struct bch_nvm_pgalloc_recs *find_nvm_pgalloc_recs(struct
>> bch_nvm_namespace *ns,
>>> + struct bch_nvm_pages_owner_head *owner_head, bool create)
>> {
>>> + int ns_nr = ns->sb->this_namespace_nr;
>>> + struct bch_nvm_pgalloc_recs *prev_recs = NULL, *recs =
>>> +owner_head->recs[ns_nr];
>>> +
>>> + /* If create=false, we return recs[nr] */
>>> + if (!create)
>>> + return recs;
>>> +
>>
>> I assume when create == false, at least the first non-full recs structure should
>> be returned before iterated all the list nodes. How about return recs by the
>> way in my next comment.
>
> Hi Coly:
> For create == false, it mean find the recs and find the rec(when free page or list all rec).
> So we return the firstly recs(iterated based on address do in other function, you can see patch5).
>
Aha, yes you are right :-) Please ignore my noise here.
Thanks.
Coly Li
