Re: remove dead bdi congestion leftovers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 12:41:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01 2020 at  5:06am -0400,
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Jens,
> > 
> > we have a lot of bdi congestion related code that is left around without
> > any use.  This series removes it in preparation of sorting out the bdi
> > lifetime rules properly.
> 
> I could do some git archeology to see what the fs, mm and block core
> changes were to stop using bdi congested but a pointer to associated
> changes (or quick recap) would save me some time.
> 
> Also, curious to know how back-pressure should be felt back up the IO
> stack now? (apologies if these are well worn topics, I haven't been
> tracking this area of development).

It isn't.  Jens declared the implementation was broken, and broke it
more.  So we're just living with stupid broken timeouts.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux