Re: [PATCH 1/2] bcache: ignore pending signals in bcache_device_init()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed 04-03-20 13:13:25, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/04, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
> > So what would be a legit usecase to drop all signals while explicitly
> > calling allow_signal?
> 
> Not sure I understand...

flush_signals will simply drop all pending signals on the floor so there
is no way to handle them, right? I am asking when is still really a
desirable thing to do when you allow_signal for the kthread. The only
one I can imagine is that the kthread allows a single signal so it is
quite clear which signal is flushed.

kernel_dequeue_signal on the other hand will give you a signal and so
the code can actually handle it in some way.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux