Re: Very slow bcache-register: 6.4TB takes 10+ minutes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le Sun, 20 Oct 2019 14:34:25 +0800
Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx> écrivait:

> So far we only have a single B+tree to contain and index all bkeys. If
> the cached data is large, this could be slow. So I suggest to create
> more partition and make individual cache set on each partition. In my
> personal testing, I suggest the maximum cache set size as 2-4TB.

Urgh. 2/4 TB is the size of common SSDs nowadays. A good use case for
bcache would be caching a 100 TB RAID array with a couple of TB of
SSDs. Too bad I have to fallback on using LVM cache instead.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |	<eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpq59hxEinZA.pgp
Description: Signature digitale OpenPGP


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux