Re: [PATCH 2/3] bcache: use allocator reserves instead of watermarks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019/7/27 6:19 下午, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> Commit 78365411b344 ("bcache: Rework allocator reserves") introduced
> allocator reserves and dropped watermarks, let's keep this consistent
> to avoid confusing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

It is OK to me, I will add it to my for-test.

Thanks.

Coly Li

> ---
>  drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
> index c22c260..609df38 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
> @@ -622,13 +622,13 @@ bool bch_alloc_sectors(struct cache_set *c,
>  	spin_lock(&c->data_bucket_lock);
>  
>  	while (!(b = pick_data_bucket(c, k, write_point, &alloc.key))) {
> -		unsigned int watermark = write_prio
> +		unsigned int reserve = write_prio
>  			? RESERVE_MOVINGGC
>  			: RESERVE_NONE;
>  
>  		spin_unlock(&c->data_bucket_lock);
>  
> -		if (bch_bucket_alloc_set(c, watermark, &alloc.key, 1, wait))
> +		if (bch_bucket_alloc_set(c, reserve, &alloc.key, 1, wait))
>  			return false;
>  
>  		spin_lock(&c->data_bucket_lock);
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux