Re: [COMPILE TESTED PATCH 6/8] target/pscsi: use helper in pscsi_get_blocks()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Okay, I'll drop this patch in the V2.

On 06/13/2019 08:36 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 6/13/19 7:59 AM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>> This patch updates the pscsi_get_blocks() with newly introduced helper
>> function to read the nr_sects from block device's hd_parts with the
>> help if part_nr_sects_read() protected by appropriate locking.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>    drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c | 2 +-
>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c b/drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c
>> index c9d92b3e777d..da481edab2de 100644
>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c
>> @@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ static sector_t pscsi_get_blocks(struct se_device *dev)
>>    	struct pscsi_dev_virt *pdv = PSCSI_DEV(dev);
>>
>>    	if (pdv->pdv_bd && pdv->pdv_bd->bd_part)
>> -		return pdv->pdv_bd->bd_part->nr_sects;
>> +		return bdev_nr_sects(pdv->pdv_bd);
>>
>>    	return 0;
>>    }
>
> As far as I can see bd_part does not change between blkdev_get() and
> blkdev_put(). Since the pscsi code guarantees that blkdev_put() is not
> called concurrently with pscsi_get_blocks() this patch is not necessary.
>
> Bart.
>
>
>





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux