Re: Critical bug on bcache kernel module in Fedora 30

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Some potential progress: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203573

On 5/30/19 2:50 PM, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
Not being sure if people here follow the issue at Fedora I'd like to pass a suggestion: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708315#c27

On 5/22/19 1:44 AM, Nix wrote:
On 21 May 2019, Coly Li uttered the following:
Also I try to analyze the assemble code of bcache, just find out the
generated assembly code between gcc9 and gcc7 is quite different. For
gcc9 there is a XXXX.cold part. So far I can not tell where the problem
is from yet.
This is hot/cold partitioning. You can turn it off with
-fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition and see if that helps things (and if
it doesn't, it should at least make stuff easier to compare).






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux