Re: BUG: bcache failing on top of degraded RAID-6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13 May 2019, Coly Li said:
> Since there is no simple way to detect whether the backing divice is a
> md raid device

Is this really true? I find this very surprising. Lots of mkfs programs
can detect exactly this (to determine the RAID stripe width), and it's
obvious in sysfs as well...

>                  this patch simply ignores I/O failures for read-ahead
> bios on backing device, to avoid bogus backing device failure on a
> degrading md raid array.

... but this feels like a good idea in any case. Readahead is a
performance optimization: if it fails, it is not a user-visible sign of
device failure in the same way that explicit I/O or metadata I/O is.

-- 
NULL && (void)



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux