On 07/16/2018 09:55 AM, Coly Li wrote:
> This patch adds a kernel module to test the consistency of multiple crc
> calculation in Linux kernel. It is enabled with CONFIG_TEST_CRC enabled.
>
> The test results are printed into kernel message, which look like,
>
> test_crc: crc64_le: PASSED (0x4e6b1ff972fa8c55, expval 0x4e6b1ff972fa8c55)
> test_crc: crc64_le_bch: PASSED (0x0e4f1391d7a4a62e, expval 0x0e4f1391d7a4a62e)
> test_crc: crc64_le_update: FAILED (0x03d4d0d85685d9a1, expval 0x3d4d0d85685d9a1f)
>
> kernel 0day system has framework to check kernel message, then the above
> result can be handled by 0day system. If crc calculation inconsistency
> happens, it can be detected quite soon.
>
> lib/test_crc.c can is a testing frame work for all crc consistency
drop ^^^ "can"
Well, we already have (from lib/Makefile):
obj-$(CONFIG_CRC32_SELFTEST) += crc32test.o
so lib/test_crc.c isn't exactly "for all crc".
> testings. For now, there are only test caes for 3 crc routines,
> - crc64_le()
> - crc64_le_bch()
> - crc64_le_update()
>
> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 11 ++++
> lib/Makefile | 1 +
> lib/test_crc.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 lib/test_crc.c
> diff --git a/lib/test_crc.c b/lib/test_crc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3a9442252de5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/test_crc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * CRC test driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * This module provides an simple framework to check the consistency of
> + * Linux kernel crc calculation routines in lib/crc*.c. This driver
CRC
> + * requires CONFIG_CRC* items to be enabled if the associated routines are
> + * tested here. The test results will be printed to kernel message
> + * when this test driver is loaded.
> + *
> + * Current test routines are,
> + * - crc64_le()
> + * - crc64_le_bch()
> + * - crc64_le_update()
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/printk.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/async.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> +#include <linux/crc64.h>
> +
> +struct crc_test_record {
> +
> + char *name;
> + __le64 data[4];
> + __le64 initval;
> + __le64 expval;
> + int (*handler)(struct crc_test_record *rec);
> +};
> +
> +static int chk_and_msg(const char *name, __le64 crc, __le64 expval)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (crc == expval) {
> + pr_info("test_crc: %s: PASSED:(0x%016llx, expval 0x%016llx)",
> + name, crc, expval);
> + } else {
> + pr_err("test_crc: %s: FAILED:(0x%016llx, expval 0x%016llx)",
> + name, crc, expval);
For both pr_err() lines, please print "expected" instead of "expval".
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* Add your crc test caese here */
CRC test cases
> +static int test_crc64_le(struct crc_test_record *rec)
> +{
> + __le64 crc;
> +
> + crc = crc64_le(rec->data, sizeof(rec->data));
> + return chk_and_msg(rec->name, crc, rec->expval);
> +
> +}
> +
> +static int test_crc64_le_bch(struct crc_test_record *rec)
> +{
> + __le64 crc;
> +
> + crc = crc64_le_bch(rec->data, sizeof(rec->data));
> + return chk_and_msg(rec->name, crc, rec->expval);
> +}
> +
> +static int test_crc64_le_update(struct crc_test_record *rec)
> +{
> + __le64 crc = rec->initval;
> +
> + crc = crc64_le_update(crc, rec->data, sizeof(rec->data));
> + return chk_and_msg(rec->name, crc, rec->expval);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Set up your crc test initial data here.
> + * Do not change the existing items, they are hard coded with
> + * pre-calculated values.
> + */
> +static struct crc_test_record test_data[] = {
> + { .name = "crc64_le",
> + .data = { 0x42F0E1EBA9EA3693, 0x85E1C3D753D46D26,
> + 0xC711223CFA3E5BB5, 0x493366450E42ECDF },
> + .initval = 0,
> + .expval = 0xe2b9911e7b997201,
> + .handler = test_crc64_le,
> + },
> + { .name = "crc64_le_bch",
> + .data = { 0x42F0E1EBA9EA3693, 0x85E1C3D753D46D26,
> + 0xC711223CFA3E5BB5, 0x493366450E42ECDF },
> + .initval = 0,
> + .expval = 0xd2753a20fd862892,
> + .handler = test_crc64_le_bch,
> + },
> + { .name = "crc64_le_update",
> + .data = { 0x42F0E1EBA9EA3693, 0x85E1C3D753D46D26,
> + 0xC711223CFA3E5BB5, 0x493366450E42ECDF },
> + .initval = 0x61C8864680B583EB,
> + .expval = 0xb2c863673f4292bf,
> + .handler = test_crc64_le_update,
> + },
> + { .name = NULL, }
> +};
> +
> +
> +static int __init test_crc_init(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> + int v, ret = 0;
> +
> + pr_info("Kernel crc consitency testing:");
CRC consistency
> + for (i = 0; test_data[i].name; i++) {
> + v = test_data[i].handler(&test_data[i]);
> + if (v < 0 && ret == 0)
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +late_initcall(test_crc_init);
> +
> +static void __exit test_crc_exit(void) { }
> +module_exit(test_crc_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("CRC consistency testing driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
thanks,
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
