From: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hello Coly:
This patch is somewhat difficult for me,
I think we can resolve it in a simple way.
We can take the schedule_delayed_work() under the protection of
dc->writeback_lock, and judge if we need re-arm this work to queue.
static void update_writeback_rate(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
struct cached_dev,
writeback_rate_update);
down_read(&dc->writeback_lock);
if (atomic_read(&dc->has_dirty) &&
dc->writeback_percent)
__update_writeback_rate(dc);
- up_read(&dc->writeback_lock);
+ if (NEED_RE-AEMING)
schedule_delayed_work(&dc->writeback_rate_update,
dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds * HZ);
+ up_read(&dc->writeback_lock);
}
In cached_dev_detach_finish() and cached_dev_free() we can set the no need
flag under the protection of dc->writeback_lock, for example:
static void cached_dev_detach_finish(struct work_struct *w)
{
...
+ down_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
+ SET NO NEED RE-ARM FLAG
+ up_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dc->writeback_rate_update);
}
I think this way is more simple and readable.
> struct delayed_work writeback_rate_update in struct cache_dev is a delayed
> worker to call function update_writeback_rate() in period (the interval is
> defined by dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds).
>
> When a metadate I/O error happens on cache device, bcache error handling
> routine bch_cache_set_error() will call bch_cache_set_unregister() to
> retire whole cache set. On the unregister code path, this delayed work is
> stopped by calling cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dc->writeback_rate_update).
>
> dc->writeback_rate_update is a special delayed work from others in bcache.
> In its routine update_writeback_rate(), this delayed work is re-armed
> itself. That means when cancel_delayed_work_sync() returns, this delayed
> work can still be executed after several seconds defined by
> dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds.
>
> The problem is, after cancel_delayed_work_sync() returns, the cache set
> unregister code path will continue and release memory of struct cache set.
> Then the delayed work is scheduled to run, __update_writeback_rate()
> will reference the already released cache_set memory, and trigger a NULL
> pointer deference fault.
>
> This patch introduces two more bcache device flags,
> - BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING
> bit set: bcache device is in writeback mode and running, it is OK for
> dc->writeback_rate_update to re-arm itself.
> bit clear:bcache device is trying to stop dc->writeback_rate_update,
> this delayed work should not re-arm itself and quit.
> - BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING
> bit set: routine update_writeback_rate() is executing.
> bit clear: routine update_writeback_rate() quits.
>
> This patch also adds a function cancel_writeback_rate_update_dwork() to
> wait for dc->writeback_rate_update quits before cancel it by calling
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(). In order to avoid a deadlock by unexpected
> quit dc->writeback_rate_update, after time_out seconds this function will
> give up and continue to call cancel_delayed_work_sync().
>
> And here I explain how this patch stops self re-armed delayed work properly
> with the above stuffs.
>
> update_writeback_rate() sets BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING at its beginning
> and clears BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING at its end. Before calling
> cancel_writeback_rate_update_dwork() clear flag BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING.
>
> Before calling cancel_delayed_work_sync() wait utill flag
> BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING is clear. So when calling
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(), dc->writeback_rate_update must be already re-
> armed, or quite by seeing BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING cleared. In both cases
> delayed work routine update_writeback_rate() won't be executed after
> cancel_delayed_work_sync() returns.
>
> Inside update_writeback_rate() before calling schedule_delayed_work(), flag
> BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING is checked before. If this flag is cleared, it means
> someone is about to stop the delayed work. Because flag
> BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING is set already and cancel_delayed_work_sync()
> has to wait for this flag to be cleared, we don't need to worry about race
> condition here.
>
> If update_writeback_rate() is scheduled to run after checking
> BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING and before calling cancel_delayed_work_sync()
> in cancel_writeback_rate_update_dwork(), it is also safe. Because at this
> moment BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING is cleared with memory barrier. As I mentioned
> previously, update_writeback_rate() will see BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING is clear
> and quit immediately.
>
> Because there are more dependences inside update_writeback_rate() to struct
> cache_set memory, dc->writeback_rate_update is not a simple self re-arm
> delayed work. After trying many different methods (e.g. hold dc->count, or
> use locks), this is the only way I can find which works to properly stop
> dc->writeback_rate_update delayed work.
>
> Changelog:
> v2: Try to fix the race issue which is pointed out by Junhui.
> v1: The initial version for review
>
> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michael Lyle <mlyle@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Junhui Tang <tang.junhui@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h | 9 +++++----
> drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> index 5e2d4e80198e..88d938c8d027 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> @@ -258,10 +258,11 @@ struct bcache_device {
> struct gendisk *disk;
>
> unsigned long flags;
> -#define BCACHE_DEV_CLOSING 0
> -#define BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING 1
> -#define BCACHE_DEV_UNLINK_DONE 2
> -
> +#define BCACHE_DEV_CLOSING 0
> +#define BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING 1
> +#define BCACHE_DEV_UNLINK_DONE 2
> +#define BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING 4
> +#define BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING 8
> unsigned nr_stripes;
> unsigned stripe_size;
> atomic_t *stripe_sectors_dirty;
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> index d14e09cce2f6..6d888e8fea8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> @@ -899,6 +899,32 @@ void bch_cached_dev_run(struct cached_dev *dc)
> pr_debug("error creating sysfs link");
> }
>
> +/*
> + * If BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING is set, it means routine of the delayed
> + * work dc->writeback_rate_update is running. Wait until the routine
> + * quits (BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING is clear), then continue to
> + * cancel it. If BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING is not clear after time_out
> + * seconds, give up waiting here and continue to cancel it too.
> + */
> +static void cancel_writeback_rate_update_dwork(struct cached_dev *dc)
> +{
> + int time_out = WRITEBACK_RATE_UPDATE_SECS_MAX * HZ;
> +
> + do {
> + if (!test_bit(BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING,
> + &dc->disk.flags))
> + break;
> + time_out--;
> + schedule_timeout_interruptible(1);
> + } while (time_out > 0);
> +
> + if (time_out == 0)
> + pr_warn("bcache: give up waiting for "
> + "dc->writeback_write_update to quit");
> +
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dc->writeback_rate_update);
> +}
> +
> static void cached_dev_detach_finish(struct work_struct *w)
> {
> struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(w, struct cached_dev, detach);
> @@ -911,7 +937,9 @@ static void cached_dev_detach_finish(struct work_struct *w)
>
> mutex_lock(&bch_register_lock);
>
> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dc->writeback_rate_update);
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING, &dc->disk.flags))
> + cancel_writeback_rate_update_dwork(dc);
> +
> if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dc->writeback_thread)) {
> kthread_stop(dc->writeback_thread);
> dc->writeback_thread = NULL;
> @@ -954,6 +982,7 @@ void bch_cached_dev_detach(struct cached_dev *dc)
> closure_get(&dc->disk.cl);
>
> bch_writeback_queue(dc);
> +
> cached_dev_put(dc);
> }
>
> @@ -1079,14 +1108,16 @@ static void cached_dev_free(struct closure *cl)
> {
> struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(cl, struct cached_dev, disk.cl);
>
> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dc->writeback_rate_update);
> + mutex_lock(&bch_register_lock);
> +
> + if (test_and_clear_bit(BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING, &dc->disk.flags))
> + cancel_writeback_rate_update_dwork(dc);
> +
> if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dc->writeback_thread))
> kthread_stop(dc->writeback_thread);
> if (dc->writeback_write_wq)
> destroy_workqueue(dc->writeback_write_wq);
>
> - mutex_lock(&bch_register_lock);
> -
> if (atomic_read(&dc->running))
> bd_unlink_disk_holder(dc->bdev, dc->disk.disk);
> bcache_device_free(&dc->disk);
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
> index a74a752c9e0f..b7166c504cdb 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,8 @@ STORE(bch_cached_dev)
> bch_writeback_queue(dc);
>
> if (attr == &sysfs_writeback_percent)
> - schedule_delayed_work(&dc->writeback_rate_update,
> + if (!test_and_set_bit(BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING, &dc->disk.flags))
> + schedule_delayed_work(&dc->writeback_rate_update,
> dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds * HZ);
>
> mutex_unlock(&bch_register_lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> index 4dbeaaa575bf..8f98ef1038d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,21 @@ static void update_writeback_rate(struct work_struct *work)
> struct cached_dev,
> writeback_rate_update);
>
> + /*
> + * should check BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING before calling
> + * cancel_delayed_work_sync().
> + */
> + set_bit(BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING, &dc->disk.flags);
> + /* paired with where BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING is tested */
> + smp_mb();
> +
> + if (!test_bit(BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING, &dc->disk.flags)) {
> + clear_bit(BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING, &dc->disk.flags);
> + /* paired with where BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING is tested */
> + smp_mb();
> + return;
> + }
> +
> down_read(&dc->writeback_lock);
>
> if (atomic_read(&dc->has_dirty) &&
> @@ -123,8 +138,18 @@ static void update_writeback_rate(struct work_struct *work)
>
> up_read(&dc->writeback_lock);
>
> - schedule_delayed_work(&dc->writeback_rate_update,
> + if (test_bit(BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING, &dc->disk.flags)) {
> + schedule_delayed_work(&dc->writeback_rate_update,
> dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds * HZ);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * should check BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING before calling
> + * cancel_delayed_work_sync().
> + */
> + clear_bit(BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING, &dc->disk.flags);
> + /* paired with where BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING is tested */
> + smp_mb();
> }
>
> static unsigned writeback_delay(struct cached_dev *dc, unsigned sectors)
> @@ -675,6 +700,7 @@ void bch_cached_dev_writeback_init(struct cached_dev *dc)
> dc->writeback_rate_p_term_inverse = 40;
> dc->writeback_rate_i_term_inverse = 10000;
>
> + WARN_ON(test_and_clear_bit(BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING, &dc->disk.flags));
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dc->writeback_rate_update, update_writeback_rate);
> }
>
> @@ -693,6 +719,7 @@ int bch_cached_dev_writeback_start(struct cached_dev *dc)
> return PTR_ERR(dc->writeback_thread);
> }
>
> + WARN_ON(test_and_set_bit(BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING, &dc->disk.flags));
> schedule_delayed_work(&dc->writeback_rate_update,
> dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds * HZ);
>
> --
> 2.15.1
Thanks,
Tang Junhui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
