Re: [PATCH] bcache: io.c: Fix check against error_limit in case of io errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/01/2018 10:07 PM, Pavel Vazharov wrote:
> The actual sysfs io_error_limit value is left shifted IO_ERROR_SHIFT
> times before it is stored in the error_limit.
> This fixes the un-registering of the cache set when the io_errors reach
> the error_limit value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Vazharov <freakpv@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/md/bcache/io.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/io.c b/drivers/md/bcache/io.c
> index fac97ec..1ef6ae2 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/io.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/io.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ void bch_count_io_errors(struct cache *ca, blk_status_t error, const char *m)
>  						    &ca->io_errors);
>  		errors >>= IO_ERROR_SHIFT;
>  
> -		if (errors < ca->set->error_limit)
> +		if (errors < (ca->set->error_limit >> IO_ERROR_SHIFT))
>  			pr_err("%s: IO error on %s, recovering",
>  			       bdevname(ca->bdev, buf), m);
>  		else
> 

Hi Pavel,

A similar fix is also in my device failure patch set, its name is,
    bcache: set error_limit correctly
The difference is, I remove the bit shift of error_limit.

-- 
Coly Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux