On 08/01/2018 3:22 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 01/03/2018 03:03 PM, Coly Li wrote: >> struct delayed_work writeback_rate_update in struct cache_dev is a delayed >> worker to call function update_writeback_rate() in period (the interval is >> defined by dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds). >> >> When a metadate I/O error happens on cache device, bcache error handling >> routine bch_cache_set_error() will call bch_cache_set_unregister() to >> retire whole cache set. On the unregister code path, cached_dev_free() >> calls cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dc->writeback_rate_update) to stop this >> delayed work. >> >> dc->writeback_rate_update is a special delayed work from others in bcache. >> In its routine update_writeback_rate(), this delayed work is re-armed >> after a piece of time. That means when cancel_delayed_work_sync() returns, >> this delayed work can still be executed after several seconds defined by >> dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds. >> >> The problem is, after cancel_delayed_work_sync() returns, the cache set >> unregister code path will eventually release memory of struct cache set. >> Then the delayed work is scheduled to run, and inside its routine >> update_writeback_rate() that already released cache set NULL pointer will >> be accessed. Now a NULL pointer deference panic is triggered. >> >> In order to avoid the above problem, this patch checks cache set flags in >> delayed work routine update_writeback_rate(). If flag CACHE_SET_STOPPING >> is set, this routine will quit without re-arm the delayed work. Then the >> NULL pointer deference panic won't happen after cache set is released. >> >> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 9 +++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c >> index 0789a9e18337..745d9b2a326f 100644 >> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c >> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c >> @@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ static void update_writeback_rate(struct work_struct *work) >> struct cached_dev *dc = container_of(to_delayed_work(work), >> struct cached_dev, >> writeback_rate_update); >> + struct cache_set *c = dc->disk.c; >> + >> + /* quit directly if cache set is stopping */ >> + if (test_bit(CACHE_SET_STOPPING, &c->flags)) >> + return; >> >> down_read(&dc->writeback_lock); >> >> @@ -100,6 +105,10 @@ static void update_writeback_rate(struct work_struct *work) >> >> up_read(&dc->writeback_lock); >> >> + /* do not schedule delayed work if cache set is stopping */ >> + if (test_bit(CACHE_SET_STOPPING, &c->flags)) >> + return; >> + >> schedule_delayed_work(&dc->writeback_rate_update, >> dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds * HZ); >> } >> > This is actually not quite correct; the function might still be called > after 'struct cached_dev' has been removed. > The correct way of fixing is to either take a reference to struct > cached_dev and release it once 'update_writeback_rate' is finished, or > to call 'cancel_delayed_work_sync()' before deleting struct cached_dev. Hi Hannes, The problem is not cached_dev, it is cache_set. In __update_writeback_rate(), struct cache_set is referenced. The solutions is similar as you suggested, call cancel_delayed_work_sync() before deleting struct cache_set. Junhui posted another patch to fix duplicated writeback threads issue, but also fixes this problem too. Therefore just prevent this kworker from re-arm itself again should be enough, and my next patche to stop dc->writeback_thread and dc->writeback_rate_update can be ignored, Junhui's patch is in bcache-for-next already. Thanks. Coly Li -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
