Re: [for-416 PATCH 3/3] bcache: allow quick writeback when backing idle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/01/2018 12:23 AM, Michael Lyle wrote:
> On 01/02/2018 12:53 AM, tang.junhui@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> If no front-end I/O coming, would this cause write-back IOs one by one
>> (one write-back IO issued must after the completion of the previous IO)?
>> though with zero delay time, is the write-back performance still good?
> 

Hi Mike,

> Yes-- this speeds up writeback during idle from 4k/sec to about 10MB/sec
> on my slow 5400RPM disk.  (It writes back at about 20MB/sec with deep
> queues in the same scenario).  So in this case it's about 2500x faster
> than current idle writeback, but half as fast as writeback with full
> device utilization.
> 

Nice performance data!


> With only one I/O outstanding at a time, if front-end I/O starts latency
> for the first request is still good.

It is good idea, I like it.

Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>

Thanks for the effort :-)

Coly Li


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux