Re: Bcache confirmed unsafe with 4.14.0? 4.14.1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Marc,

Friday, November 24, 2017, 2:41:12 PM, you wrote:

> I have bcache | dmcrypt | btrfs, and I was upgrading to 4.14.0 when
> someone told me about the corruption problems people noticed in 4.14.0

> Is there an understood root cause and something to avoid to not trigger
> the bug, or not so much?

The bug was caused by a change in the block layer code (outside of bcache),
commit 74d46992e0d9dee7f1f376de0d56d31614c8a17a, "block: replace bi_bdev with
a gendisk pointer and partitions index". I don't know if there are any
specific usage patterns that trigger the problem. I strongly suggest not to
run the affected kernel versions on any machine that uses bcache (or, even
better, on any machine at all).

> I saw a bunch of patches go by and I'm not too clear if 4.14.1 is safe,
> or not.

In 4.14.1 (as published here
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tag/?h=v4.14.1),
this bug was not fixed yet. However, the very recent 4.14.2 does contain the
fix (commit 62530ed8b1d07a45dec94d46e521c0c6c2d476e6, "bio: ensure
__bio_clone_fast copies bi_partno").

> Can someone advise?

> Thanks,
> Marc

Pavel Goran
  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux