Re: [PATCH 4/5] bcache: writeback: collapse contiguous IO better

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry I missed this question:

> Is it the time from writeback starts to dirty reaches dirty target, or
> the time from writeback starts to dirty reaches 0 ?

Not quite either.  I monitor the machine with zabbix; it's the time to
when the backing disk reaches its background rate of activity / when
writeback hits its minimum rate (writeback with the PI controller
writes a little past the target because of the integral term).

Viewed one way: 5/80 is just a few percent of difference (6%).  But:
I'm hopeful that further improvement can be made along this patch
series, and in any event it's 5 minutes earlier that I/O will have an
unencumbered response time after a pulse of load.

Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux