Re: Writeback efficiency -- proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Kent Overstreet
<kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The main thing to be careful about is anything you do that increases scanning
> for dirty data has the potential to cause problems by starving foreground writes
> via the writeback lock.
>
> If you or others are going to be working on this code, trying to improve that
> locking would probably be very worthwhile...

Kent--

This is a very good point.  Hopefully the approach I've got where at
most the work is doubled (and happens less frequently) isn't too bad
on this scale.  I will look at making that locking more granular, too,
though. :D

Thanks,

Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux