Re: [PATCH 13/19] bcache: delete redundant calling set_gc_sectors()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> From: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> set_gc_sectors() has been called in bch_gc_thread(), and it was called
> again in bch_btree_gc_finish() . The following call is unnecessary, so
> delete it.


I'm trying to follow the call path that proves that this is safe, but I'm 
not seeing it.  Can you explain this in more detail?

--
Eric Wheeler



> 
> Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> index 77aa20b..66d8036 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> @@ -1662,7 +1662,6 @@ static size_t bch_btree_gc_finish(struct cache_set *c)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&c->bucket_lock);
>  
> -	set_gc_sectors(c);
>  	c->gc_mark_valid = 1;
>  	c->need_gc	= 0;
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux